3,206 likes · 256 talking about this · 1,042 were here. Legislative design and scrutiny. Federal judge rules artwork created by AI cannot be copyrighted as human authorship is essential to valid copyright claim, potentially impacting Hollywood studios' ability to copyright AI. Today (August 3), the Association of Canadian Publishers has released a statement saying that the organization’s membership “is discouraged by the Supreme Court of Canada’s July 30 judgment in the long-running legal dispute. District Judge Beryl Howell affirmed the U. S. m. The judge highlighted how copyright is designed to encourage human creativity by granting limited monopolies, not nonhuman systems. " Her hit, released in 2014, spent four weeks atop the Billboard Hot 100 chart, Billboard reported. Fonts similar to Aicho font. An interview with Nobel Peace Prize winner and Novaya Gazeta EIC Dmitry Muratov on the documentary about him, attacks on reporters, his motivations, and more — The Russian newspaper editor speaks from Moscow in an exclusive interview as a new film biography charts his defiance of the Kremlin during the war in UkraineWinnie Mendoza's friends say alleged affair is out of character. Internet Archive has indicated that it will appeal the decision. A cord demonstrating bio interface artificial intelligence (AI) sits on a table during a Google AI event in San Francisco, California, U. Gimaajii features 29-units of permanent,. "The court is mindful of concerns over comity between the French and U. Congress passed the law establishing the board in 2020, aiming to create a cheaper and quicker way for creators to resolve copyright disputes. American Indian Community Housing Organization, Duluth, Minnesota. Aug 21, 2023. ), and Judge Vaden (Ct. The publishers alleged that the streaming of rock concerts was a copyright violation, and in April 2018, the judge agreed that the defendant lacked requisite license . 67,481 likes · 10,822 talking about this · 512 were here. The main news page for the Eastern Arizona Courier Newspaper in Safford, AZ to include local and national news highlights. A typical desktop font EULA will allow you to install the font on your computer for use with authoring tools including word processors, design tools and other applications that permit font selection. There are no judges who specialise only in copyright. AICHO Galleries, Duluth, Minnesota. Office of Legal Services Coordination. A key witness in former President Trump's classified documents case "retracted his prior false testimony" after hiring a new lawyer — and ditching the one paid for by a Trump PAC, prosecutors said Tuesday. Court of Appeals. The ruling was issued in a suit from Stephen Thaler challenging the government’s position refusing to register works made by AI. Courtesy the artist. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has the potential to roil the entertainment industry, sparking lawsuits and calls for regulation. United States District Court Judge Beryl A. King, “Because Summy Co. The publishers alleged that the streaming of rock concerts was a copyright violation, and in April 2018, the judge agreed that the defendant lacked requisite license . More Stories by Eriq. • The most active plaintiffs’ law firm in copyright cases was Fox Rothschild with 1,993 cases, due to a large number of file sharing cases filed on behalf of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC in 2018. The judge, Beryl Howell, said in her ruling that "human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright. A federal judge in New York this week dismissed a $25 million defamation lawsuit against Alec Baldwin about comments regarding Jan. STORY: Judge Allows Pandora to Maintain License to ASCAP’s Repertory . Nov 9 (Reuters) - A California federal judge said on Thursday that he would dismiss, for now, part of a copyright lawsuit brought by comedian Sarah. Shaw, (chief judge), Judge David R. A federal court ruled on August 18 that AI-generated artwork cannot be copyrighted on the grounds that copyright law only extends to human beings, per The Hollywood Reporter. As Jeremy Hainsworth writes for Business Intelligence for British Columbia, “The high court said tariffs set. On July 15, a Judge in the U. The lawsuit involves the posting of an entire article from the Las Vegas Review-Journal on the organization's Web site. “Nobody who’s complaining. , federal court to rule that his artificial intelligence system is entitled to copyrights for art it created. Stop in and purchase real maple syrup and wild rice from different tribes, Indigenous foods, books, apparel, pottery, soaps and skincare, beadwork, traditional and contemporary artwork, glass items, and souvenirs of all kinds. copyright law does not cover creative works created by artificial intelligence, weighing in on an issue that’s being. The legal battle over an East Baton Rouge Metro Council member's new outdoor kitchen opened a new front this week when a state district judge. Shaw will be replacing Chief Judge Suzanne Barnett who returned from retirement on Nov. S. You obtain legal advice by hiring a lawyer. The ruling was issued in a suit from Stephen Thaler challenging the government’s position refusing to register works made by AI. But a federal judge ruled against him, because "human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright. Times to Stand Trial This Month as Sarah Palin Libel Suit Heads to JuryA US judge dismissed AI copyright infringement claims against Midjourney and DeviantArt by three artists, but allowed a claim against Stability AI to proceed — While a federal judge advanced an infringement claim against Stability AI,. Response of the USPTO and USCO to an October 27, 2022 Letter Requesting the Joint Establishment of a National Commission on Artificial IntelligenceAicho Regular is a beautiful and bold serif font. Artists suing generative artificial intelligence art generators have hit a stumbling block in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit over the uncompensated and unauthorized use of billions of images. “Fundamentally, the offers mistook who’s. central to American copyright from its very inception," the judge wrote. It’s a unique and fashionable serif font created by handpik with tons of alternative characters and ligatures. publishers for copyright infringement on Friday, aiming to block a planned rollout of a feature called 'Audible Captions' that shows the. Koeltl of the United States district court in the Southern District of New York in his 47-page decision, which includes a firm rebuke to the controversial concept of “controlled digital lending. C. SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (“Department”) is amending the regulations governing the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer to reflect the creation of the position of Chief Administrative Law Judge and make technical corrections. Published Wednesday, August 23, 2023. District Court for the District of. ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comment. A group of artists are suing AI art generators Stability AI, Midjourney and DeviantArt for using their work to train AI tools. By Winston Cho. While the Office Guidance addresses copyright protection for the content that is generated through such technologies, it does not address copyright issues surrounding the use of copyrighted content as training data. Fri 21 Jul 2023 // 02:33 UTC. In one new court ruling, a federal judge has ruled work created by artificial intelligence is not able to be copyrighted. ]. Mashable has beaten a lawsuit by convincing a New York judge that it legitimately used an image on social media. " Lawyers for. C. HOUSING &SUPPORTIVE SERVICES. S. court deny Thaler’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss the case. Sledge was the chair of the Judicial Division of the American Bar Association, the largest judges’ organization in the world, and he was the first Article 1 judge to become the chair of the. Y. 115–261, §2(b), Oct. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law. As has been Judge Stanton’s style in the YouTube rulings — including the one last month that rejected Viacom’s claims for a second time — his opinion is rather short. Nov 13, 2023. Last year, the New York-based 2nd U. Outside of her law practice, Casey enjoys painting, golfing, and is a certified yoga sculpt instructor. Sarony, which held that protection could only be extended to original intellectual conceptions of human authors. Partner Lauren Schweitzer is quoted in this article from Law360 that explores some of the largest copyright rulings in the first half of 2022. Commissioner, 17152-13. Gimaajii features 29-units of permanent, supportive housing utilizing the “housing first” model. Judge Rules on Musical Evidence Exclusions — Including a Live ‘Medley’ of ‘Let’s Get It On’ and ‘Thinking Out Loud’ — in Ed Sheeran Infringement Suit Dylan Smith March 14, 2023Perlmutter, No. Federal Judge: AI Artwork Not Copyright Protected. Review Board. The three major music conglomerates. . Disney Sued by Film Financier TSG Over “Chilling Example” of Hollywood Accounting. The lawsuit, first reported by The. See Thomas Joseph Aquilino's compensation, career history, education, & memberships. Art created by artificial intelligence does not get copyright protection, a federal judge upheld a decision late last week. It is a little difficult to find Aiko Tanaka on Instagram, but we have you covered. To help make sense of this ruling and its implications for librarians, we interviewed Jonathan Band, a copyright lawyer in Washington, D. A US federal judge almost threw out a lawsuit brought by artists accusing text-to-image AI developers of copyright infringement, but decided to give the creatives a chance to improve and resubmit their complaint. S. S. S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who delivered the ruling, said copyright law hasn't ever protected "works generated by new forms of technology operating absent. D. Artwork by Carl Gawboy. A federal grand jury returned an indictment today charging eight individuals with conspiring to violate federal criminal copyright law by running two of the largest unauthorized streaming services in the United States, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars by television program and motion picture copyright owners. at 1101–05. "In our view, the law is clear that the American public is the primary beneficiary of copyright law, and the public benefits when the generation. Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world. In January, illustrators Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz sued Stability AI, Midjourney. Mann did not speak during the nearly 45-minute hearing Friday, except to talk to his attorney, Lawrence Taylor, who was appointed by the court. Victor Miller once scared moviegoers with Friday the 13th. Time: 5:30 p. Sledge was the chair of the Judicial Division of the American Bar Association, the largest judges’ organization in the world, and he was the first Article 1 judge to become the chair of the. This week, a photographer who literally risked his life capturing an aerial view of the city of Houston gave the Supreme Court the opportunity to settle this argument once and for all. "Instead of the employer solely owning copyright in the material created for their newspaper, magazine or periodical by their employed journalists or photographers, copyright in such materials is divided between employer and employee: the author of the work retains copyright for book publication and photocopying purposes, and the newspaper. A US federal judge has provided the latest answer to the question of whether AI-generated art qualifies for copyright protection. "We strongly disagree with the district court's decision," University of Surrey Professor Ryan Abbott told The Register. The case is about—among other things—whether Internet Archive’s controlled. Under the CRDRA, each judge must have a law degree and at least seven years’ legal experience. We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build. CIO in the District of Nevada, announced that he would dismiss Righthaven's lawsuit on the grounds of fair use. Although the ruling applies narrowly to a single work of AI art, it signals judicial reluctance to fundamentally expand copyright doctrine for AI creations. 804. District Judge Denise Cote. In addition, one judge must have significant knowledge of copyright law, one must have significant knowledge of economics, and one must have a minimum of five years’ judicial or quasi-judicial experience. "We've known about a. C. It is not going to happen. Howell has recently determined that AI-generated artwork cannot be copyrighted. S. 8 Tools for Photographers. Like Judge Ellis, Judge Hilton ruled in favor of the defendant. A New York federal judge has dismissed a copyright lawsuit that claimed 20th Century Fox, the Walt Disney Co. January 13, 2022 3:52pm. Aug. If you missed the webinar on international perspectives on copyright and AI in July, you can check out a full recording and transcript on our website. 2 million organizational budget with diverse funding, and a reputation for effective community engagement, innovation, and active use of cultural strategies to achieve results. In addition, one judge must have significant knowledge of copyright law, one must have significant. So far, courts have largely sided with tech companies in interpreting how copyright laws should treat AI systems. On Wednesday, Judge William Orrick of the US District Court for the Northern District of California heard oral. The judge is helping out the plaintiffs in this case. District Judge. C. 3669, added item 121A. ”Aicho Serif Font. District Judge Denise Cote. November 23, 2023 06:49 PM. Judge Howell said in her ruling that copyright law has never stretched so far as to protect "works generated by new forms of technology operating absent any guiding human hand," and that "human. The Office’s two webinars wrapped up a busy spring and summer season of listening, information gathering, and direct outreach on AI and copyright. 18) that U. They are defendants in. [Federal Register: February 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 33)] [Notices][Page . Photo: Greg Bowker/Associated Press. By Winston Cho. Beeple, The Battle of AI Art, 2022. . Jazz music will be performed during the reception by Briand Morrison. Prometheus Radio Project, No. Judge Beryl A. Start Preamble AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice. A cord demonstrating bio interface artificial intelligence (AI) sits on a table during a Google AI event in San Francisco, California, U. District Court of the District of Columbia dealt techno geeks a blow with a ruling that says creators of AI art, music, photos, and the like can. Now commonly subsumed under the broader category of legal regulations known as intellectual-property law, copyright is designed primarily to protect an artist, a publisher, or another owner against specific. District Judge Jesse Furman in the Southern District of New York in a 61-page opinion last year took copyright lawyer Richard P. S. Artists suing generative artificial intelligence art generators have hit a stumbling block in a first-of-its-kind. Emre Çitak. art. Generative AI that relies on hundreds of millions of inputs to be algorithmically fitted, are inherently parasitic in nature. This font also has uppercase, lowercase, numeric, puntuation and multilingual. ( WFLA) — While anyone can be an artist, writer, or musician and therefore entitled to copyright protections for their work, content made by artificial intelligence is no longer open. Artificial intelligence cannot hold a copyright for works it creates, a federal judge ruled Friday. never acquired the rights to the Happy Birthday lyrics, Defendants, as Summy Co. This illustration photograph taken in Helsinki on June 12, 2023, shows an AI (Artificial Intelligence) logo blended with four fake Twitter accounts bearing profile pictures apparently generated by. , music, internet/digitization, parody). A federal court has dealt a blow to the prospect of granting copyright protections to works created entirely by artificial intelligence systems. First, some. In March, the copyright office affirmed that most works generated by AI aren’t copyrightable but clarified that AI-assisted materials qualify for protection in certain instances. a judge, copyright law may demand that a court determine the most important part of a work or even whether a work is fact or fiction. , ruled Friday that artwork generated by artificial intelligence is not eligible for copyright protection because it lacks “human. Shaw will be replacing Chief Judge Suzanne Barnett who returned from retirement on Nov. October 28, 2021 8:41am. Circuit this week, a dispute over the streaming of a Polish broadcaster’s programming is likely to become an important one. A case that began with hype that someone had finally cracked the code for delivering free and legal broadcast streaming is ending with a $32. This font is suitable for invitation cards, decorations, clothing products, greeting cards and so much more. Photo by Timothy L Brock on Unsplash Earlier today, Judge John Koeltl of the Southern District of New York heard oral arguments in Hachette Book Group v. An inspiring man and "a fair judge". L. As a federal judge in Northern Alabama, Judge Sledge presided over a heavy volume of cases, while he worked with national judges’ organizations. “Performance,” the CRB judges reiterated, refers to “each instance in which any portion of a sound recording is publicly performed to a listener by means of a digital audio transmission. , federal judge decided Friday. U. Editorial Notes Amendments. history has a new judge and potentially a new headache for the Justice Department in its decadelong effort. Judge Smith and Justice Watt agree that things will be changing come July. The Judges are appointed by the Librarian of Congress to serve staggered six-year terms. S. Chosa’s artwork centers on the faces of Indigenous portraits. There were 113 state judges ages 65 and older in Texas as of Sept. People in the. Maria Dinzeo / September 12, 2019. A federal judge ruled Friday (Aug. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. Darius. ”. 22-1564 (D. August 18, 2023 @ 6:26 PM. . 19-1231. LAS VEGAS (AP) — Ex-Las Vegas Raiders player Henry Ruggs told a judge Tuesday he will admit that he drove drunk at speeds up to 156 mph, causing a fiery crash that killed a woman. Howell of the U. AI cannot generate copyrightable material, says US judges. , the case that adopted that test. Mickle II said the family is humbled and proud to have the Alachua County Criminal Court House renamed in their father's honor. AICHO Galleries is honored to announce our fourth and final art exhibition of 2022. Honoring the resiliency of Native American people by strengthening. 866 - December 22, 20205. Jim Spellman / Getty Images file. The U. Mr. During this case, all sorts. The Government today (November 27) announced the appointments of Ms Yvonne Cheng Wai-sum, SC, as the Chairman of the Copyright Tribunal, and Dr Benny Lo Kwan-ching. C. She earned her Juris Doctor from the University of Texas School of Law in 2010. ’s purported. I. "Judge Aycock provided to the state over all these many years. Strickler (economics), and Judge Steve Ruwe (copyright). In simpler terms, copyright is the right to copy. Sykes, a Native American state court judge in California, was also. The Supreme Court Overturns Third Circuit on Media Ownership Rules. Innovation for the win: A federal judge ruled today that Java's APIs are not copyrightable. S. – Stephen Fraser Myers is married to 21-year-old Winnie Daniela Mendoza's aunt. judge has ruled that AI-created art lacks copyright protection, impacting AI’s use of copyrighted content. She is from the Anishinaabe Gaa-zagaskwaajimekaag Band of. S. Attorney with the U. 3669, added item 121A. Appellants challenged numerous aspects of the Board's final determination: the Streaming Services argue that the Board's decision impermissibly applies retroactively;. October 30, 2023 4:57pm. . 9, 2018, 132 Stat. The decision, issued by Judge Beryl Howell, stemmed from computer scientist Stephen Thaler’s efforts to copyright an image he said was created by an AI model, identified as Creativity Machine. S. Red Label Music Publishing filed a federal lawsuit alleging Chiba Productions used clips of the famous 1985 Chicago Bears music video without first securing written permission. Nov 9 (Reuters) - A California federal judge said on Thursday that he would dismiss, for now, part of a. Artificial intelligence cannot hold a copyright for works it creates, a federal judge ruled Friday. The legal landscape remains complex and uncertain. District Judge Ronnie Abrams denied that defense with respect to 55 of 199 videos in question — ones. 28, 2020. [Editor’s Note: This is the first of a two-part episode on three copyright decisions issued by federal courts in 2018 that relate to the use of photos in news reporting; the second part will be posted next week. In reviving a claim from Jon Astor-White, a 9th Circuit judge faults colleagues for not recognizing the diversity problem in television and the "revolutionary nature" of one man's treatment for a. Among other statutory duties, the Register oversees the copyright registration and recordation systems of the United States, manages statutory royalty fees totaling more than a billion dollars annually, advises Congress on domestic and international copyright policy issues, and provides support on copyright matters to courts and. NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge has approved a permanent injunction against the online Internet Archive from scanning and sharing all copyrighted books already made available by publishers. Fonts; Typeface Story; License Information; Available Font Licenses For This Family. Juliette. The ruling sets a precedent for content creators, agency execs and. As a result, the judge threw out the lawsuit and denied WBTV’s request that the city pay the station’s attorney’s fees. S. Our extensive experience and deep understanding of the local market make us. Editorial Notes Amendments. C. S. Feb 09, 2023 Matt Growcoot The U. S. A federal judge has ruled that A&E’s copyright infringement lawsuit against Reelz and the producers of its biggest show, On Patrol: Live, can move forward. L. 2010—Pub. A US federal judge has ruled that human beings are an “essential part of a valid copyright claim”. 1324a, 1324b, and 1324c). Our theme “Those that have gone before us. The piano publisher will also doesn stand in the way for a judge to declared the song to be in the public division. Ryan Abbott shared in a written statement. CHICAGO — A federal judge has determined the use of “Super Bowl Shuffle” snippets in a documentary film doesn’t violate copyright protections. Id. S. While fears over the use of AI to generate intellectual property play a role in the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strike, a new ruling reaffirms only humans can have their works copyrighted. CLEVELAND, Ohio (WOIO) - Cleveland Municipal Judge Pinkey Carr resigned after being suspended indefinitely from practicing law and immediately removed from office. TAMPA, Fla. Electronic Only. Y. 18) that U. According to the opinion on Tuesday from U. 30901-30916]Judges grant such requests in thousands of copyright-infringement lawsuits each year. Eric Goldman, co-director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law, agrees that AI companies likely meet the criteria for fair use. Internet Archive—a case Authors Alliance has been following since the lawsuit was first filed back in 2020. ”The Judges Who Said So Are Sadly Mistaken. U. Updated 11:21 AM PST, August 15, 2023. "The act of human creation — and how to best encourage human individuals to engage in that creation, and thereby promote science and the useful arts — was. S. S. While the court must adhere to these principles in making its decision, it should also refrain from making subjective judgments on the inherent value or truthfulness of a particular faith. 2010—Pub. Copyright Office’s position that entirely AI generated artworks do not qualify. Wright, who says he wrote. A few million dollars, potentially. Judge Koeltl ultimately rejected the Internet Archive’s interpretation of fair use and ruled in favor of the publishing industry. A federal judge ruled that a piece of art generated by AI can't be copyrighted, a decision that could have consequences for Hollywood studios. Amendments. A second manga titled Ninku Second Stage: Stories of Etonins (忍空 -SECOND STAGE 干支忍編-?) ran from 1994 to 1995, but. Mr. The lawsuit, filed in New York. S. (2)(a) Ownership of copyright in a cinematographic work shallThe WGA updated its members on the 109th day of the 2023 writers strike, now nine days longer than the union’s last strike in 2007-08, a work stoppage that cost the California economy an. October 30, 2023 4:57pm. It’s also a ruling that could face a federal appeal. L. The Verve frontman Richard Ashcroft went through a 22-year dispute over a four-second string sample of an orchestral version of the Rolling Stones’ song The. Artwork created by artificial intelligence isn't. com. , federal court to rule that his artificial intelligence system is entitled to copyrights for art it created. District Court for the District of Columbia, agreed with. and there are several ligature. TAMPA, Fla. judge ruled that no AI art can be copyrighted because it hasn’t been made by human hands. A federal judge has ruled that images generated with artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be copyrighted while contrasting them with photography. N. Judge Swain granted summary judgment in favor of 2K Games and Take-Two Interactive Software, the publishers of NBA 2K. A case that began with hype that someone had finally cracked the code for delivering free and legal broadcast streaming is ending with a $32. The screenwriters behind the original Predator movie and Disney’s 20th Century Studios have agreed to a confidential settlement to drop dueling. In addition, one judge must have significant knowledge of copyright law, one must have significant. This week, a photographer who literally risked his life capturing an aerial view of the city of Houston gave the Supreme Court the opportunity to settle this argument once and for all. “We look forward to the keen intelligence, work ethic. The decision reinvigorated the legal debate over whether digital artwork created by the latest AI text-to-image tools could be copyrighted or not. S. Near his decision’s conclusion,. Artwork created by artificial intelligence isn’t eligible for copyright protection because it lacks. Chief Copyright Royalty Judge James Sledge met with Billboard for an exclusive interview to explain how the new Copyright Royalty Board works. Congress Passes CASE Act of 2020 and Law Regarding Unauthorized Streaming Services Issue No. Before joining THR in 2022. July 21, 2023 12:35pm. In a significant judgment in the AI realm, A US federal judge has pronounced that artwork created by Artificial Intelligence will not be eligible for copyrights. They are defendants in. According to US District Court Judge Beryl A. S. VidAngel. Summary. 9143-9146]Notices of Noncommercial Use/Opt-Out Notices Relating to Pre-72 Sound Recordings. S. Judge Howell said in her ruling that copyright law has never stretched so far as to protect "works generated by new forms of technology operating absent any guiding human hand," and that "human. S. By Winston Cho. United States District Court Judge Beryl A. "We strongly disagree with the district court's decision," University of Surrey Professor Ryan Abbott told The Register. The ruling catalyze conversations about the broader implications of AI’s presence in our lives, from reshaping the way we create to redefining the value we place on human ingenuity. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia last year again rejected the FCC’s most recent efforts to relax the media ownership rules which sought to. Eriq Gardner More Stories by Eriq. ” Read the source article at The VergeArtificial Intelligence boosters have taken a loss after a D. The judge cited decades of legal precedent that such protection is only afforded to works created by humans. The Judges Should Not Reverse The Unclaimed Funds Ruling Since the very first cable royalty allocation proceeding in 1978, the Judges have consistently applied the Unclaimed Funds Ruling. Our critic. Sarony, in which the Supreme Court ruled that there was “no doubt” that protection can be extended to photos so long as “they are representative of original intellectual conceptions of the author. Court of Appeals for the D. Judge Howell reasoned that although copyright is “designed to adapt with the times” and contemplates new and unforeseen mediums of expression, the requirement of human authorship – and, more specifically, human creativity – is the immutable “sine qua non at the core of copyrightability. PG is a lawyer, but nothing you will read here is legal advice. Each may be reappointed to subsequent six-year terms. ( WFLA) — While anyone can be an artist, writer, or musician and therefore entitled to copyright protections for their work, content made by artificial intelligence is no longer open. The Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 amended sec-Judge. text prompts. An application. The 44-year-old father. A federal judge in Washington, D. " In short: If no human was involved in the creation, there's no copyright. D. Artist receives first known US copyright registration for latent diffusion AI art.